Monster Card Monday: 1938 Jimmie Foxx

foxx38

Were it not for Hank Greenberg’s 58 homeruns, Jimmie Foxx would have won the triple crown in 1938.  Foxx did lead the AL with a .349 average and 175 rbis.  Pretty much any other year, he would have probably been the HR king too with his 50 homers. 

By 1938, Foxx was playing for the Boston Red Sox.  Not only did he win the batting crown that year but his slugging percentage (.704) and on-base percentage (.462) were tops too. 

Split G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG
1938 Totals 149 685 565 139 197 33 9 50 175 5 4 119 76 .349 .462 .704
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 9/23/2012.

 

You can always tell a true monster card among full time players.  They’re the ones with potentially good numbers where they shouldn’t be.  Foxx has a few of those.  He’s got a 26-14 and a 46-41 and if you want to stretch, a 61-37.  The reason for that is of course, the combination of his high batting average (.349) and walk rate (119 in 685 PA). 

One might call Jimmie Foxx a prototypical slugger but he only has three 13s.  Not bad.  Looking at his career stats, 1938 was a good year for him in that category (league leading 119 BB to 76 K) but throughout his career, he kept pace.  Generally, his free passes outnumbered his strikeouts each year with some exceptions.  For his career, he had 1452 walks and 1311 strikeouts.

 

And for a slugger, Foxx hit just enough triples (9) to justify a single column 3 (my personal favorite part of this card). 

Thanks again to Rich Zawadzki for his suggestion and help with this post!!

Thomas Nelshoppen

I am an IT consultant by day and an APBA media mogul by night. My passions are baseball (specifically Illini baseball), photography and of course, APBA. I have been fortunate to be part of the basic game Illowa APBA League since 1980 as well as the BBW Boys of Summer APBA League since 2014. I am slogging through a 1966 NL replay and hope to finish before I die.

One Comment:

  1. Great idea to have videos with your article. Mel M.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.